Business-Ethics Challenge: First, Opportunity

Certain businesses and political organizations will commit themselves to a philosophy in a formal pronouncement of a code of ethics or for example the issue of a document de- and prescribing standards of conduct. Having done so, the recorded idealism is distributed or shelved, and all too often that is that.

A segment of the code of Hammurabi

Other organizations, however, will be concerned with aspects of ethics of greater specificity, usefulness, and consistency. This concern however useful does in no way prove that the ethic code has been constructed in a "good" or "right" way in the first place.

In this context here, we will use the terms "good" and "right" in a rather sloppy sense. We will want to express some things at the same time. We would like to say "in harmony with generally agreed stuff" like avoiding theft, disrespect, malevolence or slandering on one side and promoting excellent work, friendliness, politeness, respect and well-being on the other side.

We will ask and answer questions like Is it ethical, for example, to pay a bribe to obtain a business contract in a foreign country? Is it ethical to allow your company to withhold information that might discourage a job candidate from joining your organization? Is it ethical to ask someone to take a job you know will not be good for their career progress? Is it ethical to do personal business on company time?

Many people see unethical behavior as a cancer working on the fabric of society in too many of today's organizations already. Many are concerned that we face a crisis of ethics in the West that is undermining its strength. This crisis involves business-people, government officials, customers, and employees. Especially worrisome is unethical behavior among employees at all levels.

For example, a study, 20 years ago, by consulting company Jack L. Hayes International already found that employees accounted for a higher percentage of retail thefts than did customers (LA Times, 1989). The study estimated that one in every fifteen employees steals from his or her employer.

On the other hand, we can see that, allthough many people worry about ethics a lot of others and sometimes and in a different field the same people are involved in unethical behaviour. And we have not even talked about the Internet Bubble, post 2000 business scandals and certain derivative certificate practices yet.

Why Does Unethical Behaviour Occur In Business Companies And Political Parties?

Gelegenheit macht Diebe.

In the German language their is a saying. "Gelegenheit macht Diebe". We estimate that this is a fundamental truth.

The opportunities for individuals and organizations to behave unethically seem to be limitless. Unfortunately, this potential is too frequently realized. Consider, for example, how greed overtook concerns about human welfare when the Manville Corporation suppressed evidence that asbestos inhalation was killing its employees, or when Ford failed to correct a known defect that made its Pinto car vulnerable to gas tank explosions following low speed rear-end collisions.

Companies that dump dangerous waste materials into our rivers and oceans also appear to favor their own interests over public safety and welfare. Although some of these examples are better known than many others, in the course of a human life nobody can get the impression that they are unusual. In fact, the story they tell may be far more typical than we would like, as we see estimations like the one that about two-thirds of the 500 largest American corporations have been involved in one form of illegal behaviour or another.

Be it as it may, in the United States of America business ethics has long since become an important topic, the interest of research in the country's most famous business schools and many other venues.

In Europe things are a bit different. Business ethics seem to be seen as an integral part of public and state ethics and are widely perceived as being common ground in the corresponding ideologies of social market economy and social and/or christian democracy.

Opportunity creates behaviour

However, since the start of the current financial and economical crisis, voices that promote a special focus on this branch of applied ethics, business ethics and terms like corporate social responsibility start to find their place in papers, television, radio, the web and other forms of public discourse.

As we have stated already, the most common and main reason for behaving unethically is opportunity. Without opportunity we would not even need ethics to decide if we should do one thing or not or to decide if we judge the actions of other people than ourselves as unethical or not.

 

It is not opportunity, but rather jealousy, money and power that makes thieves

I do not believe that opportunity makes thieves. I believe that:

-when employees steal from their employer, it is primarily because they feel they are not compensated enough or are not happy with some part of their job, e.g. not treated well, not satisfied, etc.

-when people steal, it may also be a envious/jealous motive, e.g. "why not- they have MORE/lots of money/won't miss it"

-stealing is a matter of a lack of instilled morals ethics, NOT opportunity.

Instead of looking at statistics of people who steal, it may be more enlightening to study those people who are in the same situation/conditions, have the opportunity, but do NOT steal. My guess is that it is a moral issue.

Most of the time, money (or lack thereof) also plays a significant role.

For example, companies who do unethical things (e.g. polluting rivers, etc.) do so for the aforementioned reasons, e.g. lack of morals/ethics and money (often it would cost the company considerably more to properly dispose of such substances).. many companies move factories to countries where the people who work for them are practically treated like slaves, yet many of these companies turn a blind eye. Why? Because of the money.

Our society has taught people to crave money, lots of it, regardless of how you have to go about getting it. Money creates status, Money creates power. Money is the root of all evil.

It's time we teach our children real values and morals and ethics, meaning NOT to WANT the brand names, the latest toys, the money... and then observe how they enter the business world as people with values and ethics, who as managers, care more about their employees well-being than the money and as employees who try to initiate change when done wrong instead of choosing to rip off their employer.

If we "eliminate opportunity" as your article suggests, then we will create even more distrust between individuals and between managers and their employees, and as every good-hearted person knows, without trust, you have nothing.

... plink  

 

First, jealousy, money and power need opportunity to appear

This article was just the start of a series that we were regrettably too lazy and too busy to properly continue. We still hope to go on in due time. It also does not imply that we should eliminate opportunity, maybe reduce it, but surely no more than that.

Oppertunity is just a first base. Oppertunity, for example, means a situation where a countess has a servant who has to look at jewels that are someone else's property on many days of her life. The day where opportunity to steal those gems will surely come. A farmer's child who is no servant will never see that kind of opportunity come.

Basically humans are naturally inclined to take good and nice things, which is/was completely ok as long as they took it from nature. Then some started to take from other groups or other individuals from their group. With sedentism came private property and that drastically extended the numbers and forms of situations where "taking things" was ethically "not ok". On the other hand we have many stories like the one of Robin Hood who takes from the rich (against laws and standard ethics) and gives to the poor, while allowing himself one or another good piece of meat and a present for maid Marian. Most people would feel non-standard ethics are right in such a case. So ethics is one part and circumstances yet another.

This blogpost does not say that a lack of (functioning) ethics does not play a large role in stealing, greed and so on. It rather asks, why do ethics, of which we have written examples for roughly the last 3700 years now (Hammurabi's Code) and which practically all condemn and forbid greed and stealing not work for a substantial number of people. We do not believe that going back to the fifties, sixties or 19th century provides a viable solution. We also do not think that things are so much different now than then.

We try to say that greed and stealing could have intensified because there is just so much more wealth and wealth gap, that opportunity for greed and stealing has considerably risen in the last 200 years. Of course we must go on and ask, why ethics did not work in former times and works (maybe) even less today.

... plink  

 

maybe some brain food for this story: paul graham's what we look for in founders or his conversation with fred wilson

... plink  


... answer!
 
last updated: 05.04.22, 07:16
menu

Youre not logged in ... Login

April 2024
So.Mo.Di.Mi.Do.Fr.Sa.
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930
April
Made with Antville
powered by
Helma Object Publisher
recently modified
Geändert
Inzwischen hat Herr Fidler den Fehler erkannt und korrigiert sowie sich inzwischen bei den LeserInnen entschuldigt. Nur damit das nicht untergeht. Wir haben hier in der....
by StefanL (21.02.22, 09:17)
There has been evidence
that the important and successful ideas in MSFT - like licensing the Unix source code in the 70ies and learning from it and licensing QDOS....
by StefanL (02.01.22, 11:18)
Now
I think I maybe know what you meant. It is the present we know best and the future we invent. And history is mostly used....
by StefanL (02.01.22, 09:51)
???
Hey, it's just a phrase wishing to convey that you're always smarter after the event than before it.
by StefanL (28.12.21, 07:35)
Addendum
Oracle is now mentioned in the English Wikipedia article on teletext and even has its own article here. Electra has one too.
by MaryW (22.12.21, 07:11)
We have grossly erred
At least in point 5. We thought, people would have come to the conclusion that permanently listening to directive voices as an adult is so....
by MaryW (21.12.21, 07:42)
Did not want to spell the names out
Ingrid Thurnher should have been easy, as she is pictured in the article. Harald F. is an insider joke, the only media journalist in Austria,....
by StefanL (19.12.21, 08:45)
...
with four letters it becomes easier though i am not sure with hafi… anyhoo, inms guessing acronyms or whatever this is. *it’s not my steckenpferd
by tobi (24.11.21, 20:49)
Should be
pretty easy to guess from the context and image who HaFi and InTu are. Besides, thx for the hint to the open bold-tag.
by MaryW (22.10.21, 01:16)
Low hanging fruit
1 comment, lower geht es mathematisch schon aber psychosomatisch nicht.
by MaryW (15.10.21, 19:51)
...
da ist wohl ein <b> offen geblieben… und wer oder was sind HF und IT?
by tobi (25.09.21, 10:50)
manche nennen das
low hanging fruits, no?¿
by motzes (25.08.21, 20:33)
Freiwillige Feuerwehr
Wie ist das mit den freiwilligen und den professionellen Feuerwehren? Wenn 4 Häuser brennen und nur 2 Löschzüge da sind, dann gibt es doch eine....
by MaryW (22.07.21, 07:06)
Well
That is a good argument and not to be underestimated. I was convinced a malevolent or rigid social environment (the others) posed the largest obstacle....
by MaryW (18.07.21, 08:54)
Und noch etwas
Die Schutzkleidung ist ein großes Problem. Sie verhindert allzu oft, dass mann mit anderen Säugetieren gut umgehen kann.
by StefanL (26.05.19, 07:09)
Yeah
U get 1 big smile from me 4 that comment! And yes, i do not like embedded except it is good like this. It's like....
by StefanL (19.05.19, 16:30)
Mustererkennung
Just saying. #esc #strachevideo pic.twitter.com/OIhS893CNr— Helene Voglreiter (@HeeLene) May 19, 2019 (Sorry, falls embedded unsocial media unerwünscht ist…)
by tobi (19.05.19, 10:57)
Yeah
That's an adequate comment! Und das erste Zitat ein ganz besonders tolles Beispiel für den "Umschlag von Quantität in Qualität".
by MaryW (15.05.19, 19:57)
...
In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen people. – Momus You’ll always be a planet to me, Mr Bacchus. – Charon Fußnote! Find ick knorke.....
by tobi (15.05.19, 14:07)
...
what about hindsight is 20/20?
by tobi (05.05.19, 14:00)

RSS Feed