Nach Hause | Roll: botic | catfish | chl | ghack | girlsCamp | j.ortner | oberhamsi | p3k | ribbonfarm |
StefanL, 10.12.05, 16:13
|
Rank | Company | Annual Revenues |
---|---|---|
#1 | Micropro International | $60,000,000 |
#2 | Microsoft Corp. | $55,000,000 |
#3 | Lotus | $53,000,000 |
#4 | Digital Research | $45,000,000 |
#5 | VisiCorp | $43,000,000 |
#6 | Ashton-Tate | $35,000,000 |
#7 | Peachtree | $21,700,000 |
#8 | MicroFocus | $15,000,000 |
#9 | Software Publishing | $14,000,000 |
#10 | Broderbund | $13,000,000 |
OK, Microsoft is number 2, but it is one of a handful of companies with roughly similar annual revenues.
What we can also see: the PC is a Textprocessor (by this I decidedly do no mean to say Symbolprocessor), even more than a numbers processor (namely by spreadsheeting) and more than a graphic bits' processor. You'd have a harder time proving this today (and in the above table you could also ad Lotus' and Visicalc's revenues, but then you would not see all the other text processing money), just think of MS-Office though, thoroughly. Wordprocessing did not originate with the PC as did the Spreadsheet but was probably even more of a reason for PCs in offices than that famous "Killer Application.
WordPerfect was not even in this list, as we see, nevertheless took the market away from MicroPro 2 years later. Her I have 2 interesting quotations from one of their history chapters: by their former CFO W.E. Peterson
"I remember when a few of us were eating lunch at the local Sizzler, an eavesdropper interrupted to say, "Are you guys writing a word processor for the PC? So are we." So was everyone else. At least 200 companies would introduce a word processor for the IBM PC within the next two years. Most of these products would never make money, because the market would get very crowded very quickly, but our risk of failure was not as great as most of these other companies. Already many of our Data General customers were planning to buy IBM PC's and hoping to use SSI*WP on them."
"We learned a lot from watching Lotus do it the right way. They spent about half a million dollars developing 1-2-3, which was approximately the same amount of money we spent in developing the DG and PC versions of WordPerfect. They spent about two million dollars on their 1-2-3 roll-out; their ads, brochures, packaging, distribution, and public relations were all very professionally done. We, however, spent only $100,000 on our roll-out and generally looked like amateurs at everything we did. 1-2-3 would become the most popular spreadsheet as soon as it was released. We would need five years to become the most popular word processor."
This last one as well as Apples famous 1984 superbowl spot shed some light on marketing in the PC world.
One funny last little thing: Broderbund was still #12 in 1998. I have only a file softletter98 (text/html, 519 KB) from Google's cache to prove that.
plink, nix, praise or blame!Rebel Party
Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients Vint and Bob at the White House >>rebels against any evil empire<< party. Dig that Muhammad Ali was there too.
plink, only 1 comment, praise or blame!CGI (imagery, not interface)
Piefke 3000 has got a very good Critical history of Computer graphics linked.
The great Ivan of Ivan and Bert fame at his Workstation Mark the direct access to helpline supportAttention this might be nearly >>linked loops<< of a sort.
plink, nix, praise or blame!Windows Media Player for MacOs
Helps and then does not.
If you install Windows Media Player for MacOs X at the right time it works pretty well for straight forward Windows Media 9 movies, soundpieces and streams. It even installs halfway decent Firefox and Safari plugins.
However there is more than one indication that MS does not take th Mac serious in this matter. If you try to play a multibitrate stream WMP9fMO always plays the worst quality. If you try movies with an mp3 soundtrack it cannot render the sound at all and complains about an unknown format and codec.
So this piece of software ist there to help tied into MS solutions setups to have an excuse to not care about anything else. Real is no solution to this problem because the free player is so disgusting you really do not want to force this although server per concurrent streams licences have come down quite a bit again.
plink, nix, praise or blame!1984 AT&T Unix Prices
You wll find them (pdf) on Dennis Ritchie's pages who got them from one Herr Kleine in Jena.
Small wonder Unix didn't make it in the 80ies for affordable computing outside a campus.
plink, nix, praise or blame!