A large majority of the constitutions of the countries in this world guarantee the respective freedoms of speech, of the press and of the peacefull assembly of people. Both freedoms seem to be fundamentally based on the freedom of religion. An amendment to the constitution of the United States of America demonstrates this with relatively few limitations. In Europe and Asia, tradition would demand and enforce quite a lot of buts and ifs to go with these freedoms.
So as an example of what we think - for the time being - is as good as it gets in the real world, we will cite the passage from the afore mentioned amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to conceive of and enact redress of grievances.
The freedom of pleasure on the other hand is not provided for or guaranteed by any constitution we would know of. The reason for this seems to be that the coalition of officials, officers, industrialists, smallholders and craftsmen who enacted and won the English, American and French revolutions, did not particularly like thoughts about pleasure. Why? That was because their limited analysis of the world told them that the main difference between them and the nonfunctional elite they had dethroned or were aiming to dethrone was that they, the new elite, worked all the time whereas the ancien regime nobility did practically do nothing but devote itself to pleasure and occasional wars.
The attitude of tinytalk in the question of the freedom of pleasure until it be ruled by a constitution or similar agreed document is:
Any woman, man or group shall be responsible to govern the freedom of pleasure individually and in a rather nondestructive way, please.
The Requirements
So, if you want to register to, read, proliferate or in any other than a completely passive way use these pages, you oughta agree to the above mentioned prerequisites. You should support the freedoms of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly, redress of grievances and the nondestructive individual regulation of the freedom of pleasure.
Beside the ethic requirements and the necessity to strict adherence thereof, this publication has practically no reservations against any kind of consumation and interaction. Our contents may be stolen, misconstrued, reshaped, quoted and used in any sensible or unsensible way. For your own good just keep in mind that a lot of our stuff here is only h*a*l*f *l*e*g*a*l anyway. Caute!
We do have a cause though. It is obscenity. We're for it. Unfortunately the civil liberties types who are fighting this issue have to fight it owing to the nature of the laws as a matter of freedom of speech and stifling of free expression and so on but we know what's really involved: dirty books are fun. That's all there is to it.
To this you only need to agree to informally and without explicit expression. The gentle woman enjoys and keeps quiet.
The Small Print
To be able to take an active and visible role (to praise and to blame right here and now) the concerned party will be obliged to register with the antville user database and correctly answer the subsequent and repeated login challenges. It will then be thoroughly geolocated, deep-packet-inspected, remotely x-rayed and reserved for delayed use as an innocent victim of the 'better-products-communications' industry.
In the quite unlikely event that readers or viewers were to discover any omissions or inaccuracies in these pages, they are welcome to report them to scilabs(at)jammed.co.jm, our scientific service dept., where the facts listed in your report will be thoroughly investigated, submitted to rigorous testing and, if substantiated and judged useful, quite probably included in a subsequent update. This will work so fast you will not even notice.
We could just barely
keep the censor's office and the press team of the president-elect from intervention but here are our apologies and our thanks for these valuable hints....
by MaryW (17.12.24, 23:37)
...
The (correct) first name of Mr. Zelenskyj is the Ukrainian Володи́мир, not (of all things) the Russian Влади́мир 😿
Second name is Oleksandrovych.
Ложка дьогтю у бочці....
by tobi (16.12.24, 19:15)
Du hast recht,
Universal-Genies brauchen wir echt keine mehr. Ich wollte eh nur sagen:
Things are going to slide, slide in all directions.
Won't be nothing, won't be nothing you....
by MaryW (31.10.24, 23:13)
...
Hm. Ich glaub, da gibt es schon noch einige Kandidat*innen. Mir fällt spontan Lisz Hirn ein. Ich fürchte nur, die schaffen es nicht mehr, so....
by tobi (03.10.24, 19:21)
Das sind
wirklich die allerletzten, diese Streberschweine. Aber sonst auch.
by StefanL (18.09.24, 08:42)
Es gibt sogar
Verbrecher, die das ganze WE zusätzlich durcharbeiten, um Pegelkarten zu bauen. Das sind dann die allerletzten.
by gHack (17.09.24, 18:56)
Geändert
Inzwischen hat Herr Fidler den Fehler erkannt und korrigiert sowie sich inzwischen bei den LeserInnen entschuldigt.
Nur damit das nicht untergeht. Wir haben hier in der....
by StefanL (21.02.22, 09:17)
There has been evidence
that the important and successful ideas in MSFT - like licensing the Unix source code in the 70ies and learning from it and licensing QDOS....
by StefanL (02.01.22, 11:18)
Now
I think I maybe know what you meant. It is the present we know best and the future we invent. And history is mostly used....
by StefanL (02.01.22, 09:51)
???
Hey, it's just a phrase wishing to convey that you're always smarter after the event than before it.
by StefanL (28.12.21, 07:35)
Addendum
Oracle is now mentioned in the English Wikipedia article on teletext and even has its own article here. Electra has one too.
by MaryW (22.12.21, 07:11)
We have grossly erred
At least in point 5. We thought, people would have come to the conclusion that permanently listening to directive voices as an adult is so....
by MaryW (21.12.21, 07:42)
Did not want to spell the names out
Ingrid Thurnher should have been easy, as she is pictured in the article. Harald F. is an insider joke, the only media journalist in Austria,....
by StefanL (19.12.21, 08:45)
...
with four letters it becomes easier though i am not sure with hafi… anyhoo, inms guessing acronyms or whatever this is.
*it’s not my steckenpferd
by tobi (24.11.21, 20:49)
Should be
pretty easy to guess from the context and image who HaFi and InTu are. Besides, thx for the hint to the open bold-tag.
by MaryW (22.10.21, 01:16)
Low hanging fruit
1 comment, lower geht es mathematisch schon aber psychosomatisch nicht.
by MaryW (15.10.21, 19:51)
...
da ist wohl ein <b> offen geblieben…
und wer oder was sind HF und IT?
Freiwillige Feuerwehr
Wie ist das mit den freiwilligen und den professionellen Feuerwehren? Wenn 4 Häuser brennen und nur 2 Löschzüge da sind, dann gibt es doch eine....