|
|
StefanL, 10.12.05, 16:13
"For a long time Softletter Editor Jeffrey Tarter used to publish an annual list of the hundred largest personal computer software publishers called the Soft-letter 100. Here's what the top ten looked like in 1984:"
Rank |
Company |
Annual Revenues
|
#1 |
Micropro International |
$60,000,000 |
#2 |
Microsoft Corp. |
$55,000,000 |
#3 |
Lotus |
$53,000,000 |
#4 |
Digital Research |
$45,000,000 |
#5 |
VisiCorp |
$43,000,000 |
#6 |
Ashton-Tate |
$35,000,000 |
#7 |
Peachtree |
$21,700,000 |
#8 |
MicroFocus |
$15,000,000 |
#9 |
Software Publishing |
$14,000,000 |
#10 |
Broderbund |
$13,000,000 |
OK, Microsoft is number 2, but it is one of a handful of companies with roughly similar annual revenues.
What we can also see: the PC is a Textprocessor (by this I decidedly do no mean to say Symbolprocessor), even more than a numbers processor (namely by spreadsheeting) and more than a graphic bits' processor. You'd have a harder time proving this today (and in the above table you could also ad Lotus' and Visicalc's revenues, but then you would not see all the other text processing money), just think of MS-Office though, thoroughly. Wordprocessing did not originate with the PC as did the Spreadsheet but was probably even more of a reason for PCs in offices than that famous "Killer Application.
WordPerfect was not even in this list, as we see, nevertheless took the market away from MicroPro 2 years later. Her I have 2 interesting quotations from one of their history chapters: by their former CFO W.E. Peterson
"I remember when a few of us were eating lunch at the local Sizzler, an eavesdropper interrupted to say, "Are you guys writing a word processor for the PC? So are we." So was everyone else. At least 200 companies would introduce a word processor for the IBM PC within the next two years. Most of these products would never make money, because the market would get very crowded very quickly, but our risk of failure was not as great as most of these other companies. Already many of our Data General customers were planning to buy IBM PC's and hoping to use SSI*WP on them."
"We learned a lot from watching Lotus do it the right way. They spent about half a million dollars developing 1-2-3, which was approximately the same amount of money we spent in developing the DG and PC versions of WordPerfect. They spent about two million dollars on their 1-2-3 roll-out; their ads, brochures, packaging, distribution, and public relations were all very professionally done. We, however, spent only $100,000 on our roll-out and generally looked like amateurs at everything we did. 1-2-3 would become the most popular spreadsheet as soon as it was released. We would need five years to become the most popular word processor."
This last one as well as Apples famous 1984 superbowl spot shed some light on marketing in the PC world.
One funny last little thing: Broderbund was still #12 in 1998. I have only a file softletter98
(text/html, 519 KB)
from Google's cache to prove that.
plink, nix, praise or blame!
|
|
|
last updated: 24.11.24, 06:29
Youre not logged in ... Login
powered by
Du hast recht,
Universal-Genies brauchen wir echt keine mehr. Ich wollte eh nur sagen:
Things are going to slide, slide in all directions.
Won't be nothing, won't be nothing you....
by MaryW (31.10.24, 23:13)
...
Hm. Ich glaub, da gibt es schon noch einige Kandidat*innen. Mir fällt spontan Lisz Hirn ein. Ich fürchte nur, die schaffen es nicht mehr, so....
by tobi (03.10.24, 19:21)
Die sind
wirklich die allerletzten.
by StefanL (18.09.24, 08:42)
Es gibt sogar
Verbrecher, die das ganze WE zusätzlich durcharbeiten, um Pegelkarten zu bauen. Das sind dann die allerletzten.
by gHack (17.09.24, 18:56)
Geändert
Inzwischen hat Herr Fidler den Fehler erkannt und korrigiert sowie sich inzwischen bei den LeserInnen entschuldigt.
Nur damit das nicht untergeht. Wir haben hier in der....
by StefanL (21.02.22, 09:17)
There has been evidence
that the important and successful ideas in MSFT - like licensing the Unix source code in the 70ies and learning from it and licensing QDOS....
by StefanL (02.01.22, 11:18)
Now
I think I maybe know what you meant. It is the present we know best and the future we invent. And history is mostly used....
by StefanL (02.01.22, 09:51)
???
Hey, it's just a phrase wishing to convey that you're always smarter after the event than before it.
by StefanL (28.12.21, 07:35)
Addendum
Oracle is now mentioned in the English Wikipedia article on teletext and even has its own article here. Electra has one too.
by MaryW (22.12.21, 07:11)
We have grossly erred
At least in point 5. We thought, people would have come to the conclusion that permanently listening to directive voices as an adult is so....
by MaryW (21.12.21, 07:42)
Did not want to spell the names out
Ingrid Thurnher should have been easy, as she is pictured in the article. Harald F. is an insider joke, the only media journalist in Austria,....
by StefanL (19.12.21, 08:45)
...
with four letters it becomes easier though i am not sure with hafi… anyhoo, inms guessing acronyms or whatever this is.
*it’s not my steckenpferd
by tobi (24.11.21, 20:49)
Should be
pretty easy to guess from the context and image who HaFi and InTu are. Besides, thx for the hint to the open bold-tag.
by MaryW (22.10.21, 01:16)
Low hanging fruit
1 comment, lower geht es mathematisch schon aber psychosomatisch nicht.
by MaryW (15.10.21, 19:51)
...
da ist wohl ein <b> offen geblieben…
und wer oder was sind HF und IT?
by tobi (25.09.21, 10:50)
manche nennen das
low hanging fruits, no?¿
by motzes (25.08.21, 20:33)
Freiwillige Feuerwehr
Wie ist das mit den freiwilligen und den professionellen Feuerwehren? Wenn 4 Häuser brennen und nur 2 Löschzüge da sind, dann gibt es doch eine....
by MaryW (22.07.21, 07:06)
Well
That is a good argument and not to be underestimated. I was convinced a malevolent or rigid social environment (the others) posed the largest obstacle....
by MaryW (18.07.21, 08:54)
Und noch etwas
Die Schutzkleidung ist ein großes Problem. Sie verhindert allzu oft, dass mann mit anderen Säugetieren gut umgehen kann.
by StefanL (26.05.19, 07:09)
Yeah
U get 1 big smile from me 4 that comment! And yes, i do not like embedded except it is good like this. It's like....
by StefanL (19.05.19, 16:30)
|